Tag: Power of Nigeria government

What is the Meaning of section 5 subsection two of Nigeria 1999 constitution. In this article I will like to explain the Meaning of section 5 (4) of 1999 constitution

Related article

Meaning of section 5 (3) of 1999 constitution

Meaning of section 5 (2) of 1999 constitution

Meaning of section 5 (1) of 1999 constitution

Meaning of section 5 (4) of 1999 constitution

The section 5 subsection 4 of Nigeria 1999 constitution power of executive stated that

Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section- (a) the President shall not declare a state of war between the Federation and another country except with the sanction of a resolution of both Houses of the National Assembly sitting in a joint session;

1 Despite the powers granted to the President as Commander-in-Chief, they cannot declare war on another country without the approval of the National Assembly.

2 The President needs the sanction (approval) of a joint session of both the House of Representatives and the Senate to declare a state of war between Nigeria and another country.

3 The President’s powers are balanced by the need for legislative approval, ensuring that the decision to go to war is not taken unilaterally.

4 This requires the President to seek the support of the elected representatives of the people, making war a last resort and a collective decision. This clause ensures that the President does not have absolute power to declare war, and that the legislative branch has a say in such a critical decision, promoting accountability and democratic governance.

This section is introducing an exception or limitation to the powers of the President, even though the previous sections outlined the broad executive powers of state Governors. Specifically, it states:

“Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section –

(a) the President shall not declare a state of war between the Federation and another country except with the sanction of a resolution of both Houses of the National Assembly sitting in a joint session.”

In simpler terms, this means:

The President does not have the unilateral authority to declare war against another country. Instead, the President can only declare a state of war if they have the express approval and sanction of both the Senate and House of Representatives of the National Assembly, meeting together in a joint session.

The key main points of this section are:

1. Restriction on President’s War Powers

– The President’s executive powers are limited when it comes to declaring war on another country. The President cannot act unilaterally.

2. Requirement of National Assembly Approval

– Both chambers of the National Assembly (Senate and House of Reps) must pass a joint resolution authorizing and sanctioning the declaration of war.

3. Checks and Balances on Executive War Powers

– This provision introduces legislative oversight and approval as a check on the President’s executive authority in the critical matter of war.

So in essence, this clause takes away the President’s unilateral power to declare war, and instead requires the collective approval of the National Assembly before such a momentous decision can be made. This helps balance the powers between the executive and legislative branches.

Here’s a breakdown of the key points:

National Assembly Approval Needed: The president needs a “resolution” to be passed by both houses of the National Assembly. A resolution is a formal statement that expresses the opinion or will of a legislative body. In this case, both houses (similar to the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives) need to agree to the resolution for the war declaration to move forward.

Joint Session: The law says that both houses need to vote together in a special session. This means that all the members of both houses would meet at the same time to specifically discuss and vote on the issue of war.

Basically, this law makes it more difficult for the president to start a war without the support of the legislature. This helps to ensure that a decision to go to war is carefully considered by a representative group of people.

Section b

except with the prior approval of the Senate, no member of the armed forces of the Federation shall be deployed on combat duty outside Nigeria.

1 The President or the military authorities cannot deploy Nigerian soldiers for combat duty outside Nigeria without the approval of the Senate.

2 The Senate must give its prior approval before Nigerian troops can be sent on combat missions abroad.

3 The President or the military cannot unilaterally decide to send Nigerian soldiers to fight in other countries.

4 The Senate has a say in such decisions, ensuring that the deployment of troops aligns with Nigeria’s national interests and foreign policy objectives.

This clause ensures that the deployment of Nigerian troops abroad is subject to democratic scrutiny and oversight, preventing arbitrary decisions that might put soldiers’ lives at risk or compromise national security.

This section is placing another limitation on the powers of the President regarding the deployment of the Nigerian armed forces:

Section c

“Except with the prior approval of the Senate, no member of the armed forces of the Federation shall be deployed on combat duty outside Nigeria.”

In simpler terms, this means:

The President does not have the sole authority to deploy Nigerian military personnel on combat missions outside the borders of Nigeria. The President must first obtain the prior approval of the Senate before such a deployment can occur.

The key main points of this section are:

1. Restriction on President’s Military Deployment Powers

– The President cannot unilaterally send Nigerian troops on combat operations in other countries. There are legislative checks on this executive power.

2. Requirement of Senate Approval

– The President must get the explicit approval of the Nigerian Senate before ordering the deployment of armed forces outside the country for combat duties.

3. Legislative Oversight of Executive Military Actions

– This provision gives the Senate the power to scrutinize and approve any planned combat deployments of the Nigerian military beyond the country’s borders. So in essence, this clause limits the President’s ability to use the armed forces for foreign combat operations. It requires the President to seek and obtain the Senate’s prior approval before such deployments can take place. This helps balance the powers between the executive and legislative branches when it comes to military actions outside Nigeria.

What is the Meaning of section 5 subsection three of Nigeria 1999 constitution. In this article I will like to explain the Meaning of section 5 (3) of 1999 constitution

Related article

Meaning of section 5 (2) of 1999 constitution

Meaning of section 5 (1) of 1999 constitution

Meaning of section 4 (8) of 1999 constitution

Meaning of section 5 (3) of 1999 constitution

The section 5 subsection 3 of Nigeria 1999 constitution power of executive stated that

The executive powers vested in a State under subsection (2) of this section shall be exercised as not to- (a) impede or prejudice the exercise of the executive powers of the Federation;

The executive powers of a State ( exercised by the Governor and their team)

Should not be used in a way that:

Impedes (obstructs or hinders) the exercise of the executive powers of the Federation (the federal government)

Prejudices (biases or harms) the exercise of the executive powers of the Federation

The State government (led by the Governor) should not use its powers to interfere with the federal government’s ability to exercise its own powers.

The State government should not take actions that would harm or obstruct the federal government’s ability to carry out its responsibilities. This clause ensures that the State government does not overstep its boundaries and encroach on the powers of the federal government, maintaining a balance of power between the two levels of government.

Here is the breakdown of this section

The executive powers vested in a State…shall be exercised as not to

This means that when a state government uses its executive power (as defined earlier), it cannot do anything that would:

impede or prejudice the exercise of the executive powers of the Federation Basically, the state government can’t make it harder or impossible for the federal government to carry out its duties.

Imagine the federal government is like a big fire department responsible for the whole country, and the state government is like a smaller fire department for a specific town. This law says the town fire department (state) can’t do anything that would prevent the big fire department (federal government) from fighting fires effectively.

Here are some examples of how a state might violate this law:

A state could pass a law making it illegal to build fire stations, which would hinder the federal government’s ability to establish fire stations in that state.

A state could refuse to cooperate with federal firefighters during a large wildfire.

This law is important because it ensures the federal government can address issues that affect the entire country, even if those issues cross state borders.

The main point of these sections are

The executive powers vested in a State Governor shall be exercised in a way that does not: (a) “impede or prejudice the exercise of the executive powers of the Federation”

In simpler terms, this means the state Governor’s use of executive power must not interfere with or undermine the exercise of executive power at the federal/national level by the President and federal government.

Some key things this provision is trying to achieve:

1. Maintaining the Integrity of Federal Executive Authority

– The state Governors cannot use their executive powers in a way that undermines or obstructs the federal government’s ability to carry out its executive functions.

2. Preventing Conflicts Between State and Federal Executive Powers

– There must be harmony and non-interference between the state-level executive powers and the federal-level executive powers.

3. Preserving the Hierarchical Structure of Government

– The federal executive authority is meant to take precedence over the state-level executive authority when there are conflicts or overlaps.

So in essence, this provision is a check on state executive power, ensuring it is exercised in a way that respects and does not impede the executive authority of the national government. It helps maintain the proper balance of power between the state and federal levels of government.

Section b

(b) endanger any asset or investment of the Government of the Federation in that State; 

1 The executive powers of a State (exercised by the Governor and their team)

I Should not be used in a way that:

II Puts at risk or endangers:

III Any assets (properties, resources, etc.) belonging to the Federal Government

IV Any investments (projects, programs, etc.) made by the Federal Government

2 The State government should not use its powers to take actions that would harm or put at risk the Federal Government’s assets or investments in the State.

3 This ensures that the State government does not jeopardize the Federal Government’s interests or put its resources in harm’s way. This clause protects the Federal Government’s assets and investments in the State, preventing the State government from taking actions that could harm or destroy them.

This is the breakdown of this section

The executive powers vested in a State…shall be exercised as not to… We already know from the previous clause that a state government’s actions can’t interfere with the federal government’s ability to do its job.

endanger any asset or investment of the Government of the Federation in that State: This clause specifically refers to the state government avoiding actions that could put federal property or investments at risk.

Imagine the federal government owns a big hospital in a state (federal asset). This law says the state government can’t do anything that could endanger that hospital, such as cutting off its water supply or zoning the area for industrial use.

Here are some examples of how a state might violate this law:

A state could pass a law allowing the demolition of all buildings over 50 years old, which could destroy a valuable federal courthouse.

A state could refuse to provide police protection to a federal research facility, putting the facility and its employees at risk.

This law is important because it ensures the federal government can maintain its property and investments within states without being hindered by local actions. It protects the resources the federal government uses to serve the entire country.

The main point of this section

This part of the statement is providing another key limitation on how the state Governor can exercise their executive powers:

The executive powers vested in a State under this section shall be exercised in a way that does not:

(b) “endanger any asset or investment of the Government of the Federation in that State”

In simpler terms, this means the state Governor cannot use their executive authority in a way that jeopardizes or puts at risk any assets or investments that the federal government has within that particular state.

Some key things this provision is trying to achieve:

1. Protecting Federal Government Assets and Investments

– The state Governor cannot take actions with their executive power that would damage, compromise or endanger any federal government property, resources or investments located in that state.

2. Maintaining Federal Interests in the States

– This helps preserve the federal government’s ability to have a presence and protect its interests within each state, through ownership of various assets and investments.

3. Preventing Misuse of State Executive Power

– It acts as a check on the state Governor, ensuring they do not abuse their executive authority in a way that harms the federal government’s standing or operations within that state.

So in essence, this provision puts a constraint on the state Governor, requiring them to exercise their executive powers in a manner that safeguards and does not jeopardize any federal government assets or investments within that particular state. This helps maintain the balance of power between the state and federal governments.

Section 5 c

(c) endanger the continuance of a federal government in Nigeria.

1 The executive powers of a State (exercised by the Governor and their team)

2 Should not be used in a way that:

I Puts at risk or endangers the continued existence or stability of the Federal Government of Nigeria

3 The State government should not use its powers to take actions that would undermine or threaten the stability of the Federal Government or the unity of Nigeria.

4 This ensures that the State government does not engage in activities that could lead to the breakdown of the federal system or the collapse of the national government. This clause safeguards the continued existence and stability of the Federal Government of Nigeria, preventing the State government from taking actions that could jeopardize the country’s unity and stability.

Here’s a breakdown to understand it clearly:

The executive powers vested in a State…shall be exercised as not to... This builds on the previous points, reminding us that a state government’s actions are limited.

endanger the continuance of a federal government in Nigeria: This is the key part. It means a state government cannot do anything that could threaten the continued existence or functioning of the federal government itself.

This law essentially protects the core structure of Nigeria as a federation with a central governing body.

Here’s an analogy of this section

Imagine Nigeria is a big house with a central foundation that supports the entire structure. This law says that no individual room (state) in the house can take actions that could weaken or damage the foundation (federal government) because the entire house (Nigeria) would be at risk of collapsing.

Here are some examples of how a state might violate this law:

A state could attempt to declare independence from Nigeria, breaking away from the federal system.

A state could refuse to recognize the authority of the federal government or its laws.

A state could raise its own army and threaten to use it against the federal government.

This law is crucial because it safeguards the unity and stability of Nigeria as a whole. It ensures that states operate within the framework of the federal system and don’t take actions that could tear the country apart.

Some key things this provision is trying to achieve:

1. Preserving the Federal Structure of Government

– The state Governor must exercise their powers in a manner that does not jeopardize the continuation of Nigeria’s federal system of government, where there is both a national/federal government and state governments.

2. Preventing Secessionist or Destabilizing Actions

– This acts as a safeguard against a state Governor taking executive actions that could lead to the breakup of the federation or the collapse of the federal government.

3. Maintaining National Unity and Integrity

– By prohibiting actions that would “endanger the continuance of a federal government”, this provision helps protect the unity and cohesion of the Nigerian nation as a whole.

In essence, this clause places a critical limitation on the state Governor’s executive powers – they cannot exercise those powers in a way that puts the very existence of the federal government, and by extension the Nigerian federation itself, at risk. This reinforces the supremacy of the federal government and ensures the state executive authority is used in a way that preserves Nigeria’s system of federalism.